Credit: PWInsider.com

 

A transcript of the new promo for the upcoming WWE Backlash PPV (RAW brand) on April 30 in Lexington, KY may have spoiled the outcome of the WWE Championship Match between John Cena and Triple H.

 

The transcript is as follows:

 

Triple H: "At Backlash, The Game begins"

 

Shawn Michaels: "At Backlash, there is no tomorrow"

 

Big Show: "At Backlash, you can't run"

 

Chavo Guerrero: "At Backlash"

 

Ric Flair: "At Backlash"

 

Carlito: "At Backlash, the future starts"

 

Rob Van Dam: "The questions end"

 

Edge: "At Backlash"

 

Kane: "I will find you"

 

Edge: "Destroy you"

 

Chris Masters: "At Backlash, I'll make you suffer"

 

Voiceover: "At Backlash"

 

Shelton Benjamin: "At Backlash"

 

John Cena: "At Backlash, I'll take what's mine"

 

I think this pretty much confirms HHH will win the title at mania

Best news I've heard all week.

Yeah really good stuff. Also looking good for Kane, I mean there has been rumours of a smackdown title run this year and he is meant to be jumping over to Smackdown this year, so it looks like it could be a good feud for him.

Those rumours about Kane going to Smackdown have been going around for the last 6 months. Apparently he was supposed to go over and win the title off Batista and have a short Edge-esque run but that never happened. The guy is not over enough to be champion. With Rey, Orton, Angle and heck even Taker on Sd they dont need Kane to come in and take the top spot

Edited March 21, 200618 yr by MrFill

Hope you're right Daniel, Smackdown does NOT need Kane as their World Champion. He's not over enough, he's not a main eventer and he's better where he is right now.

Hope you're right Daniel' date=' Smackdown does NOT need Kane as their World Champion. He's not over enough, he's not a main eventer and he's better where he is right now.[/quote']

 

I tend to disagree, Kane would be good on Smackdown if they make a story of him becoming a monster again, Kane vs. the Boogeyman won't be a good match to watch but would be worth the watch as it would have excellent build up.

How do you know it would have excellent build up? I'd say the chances are the build up would suck balls and the match would be horrendous. They want to give Kane a World Title fine, keep him on Raw, but they shouldn't ruin the good thing Smackdown have had going for months now with a pointless Kane title run.

How do you know it would have excellent build up? I'd say the chances are the build up would suck balls and the match would be horrendous. They want to give Kane a World Title fine' date=' keep him on Raw, but they shouldn't ruin the good thing Smackdown have had going for months now with a pointless Kane title run.[/quote']

 

I guess your right about the Smackdown situation, but we know Kane can main event and he has been there before, and Smackdown haven't got many potential main event stars. I believe the build up would be good for the people who like the Boogeyman character, I personally don't, but I believe Kane would have to come back to his monster gimmick which I do like.

I cant honestly believe that someone is mentioning that a Kane v Boogeyman feud would have a good build up. Sorry to sound like a ***** but that would be one of the worst feuds they could possibly put Kane in. The Boogeyman character works simply on the fear of whoever he is feuding with and if they made Kane out to be scared it would ruin his character, but if they made him out not to be scared it would kill the Boogeymans heat. The Boogeymans two main feuds are made interesting not my the Boogeyman but by the excellent work of JBL and particulary Booker T.

No idea why people were told to use spoilers here to discuss a rumour about Kane moving to Smackdown. I've gone on an editing spree anyway to make the thread readable.

i'm confused with all of this and what it is?

No idea why people were told to use spoilers here to discuss a rumour about Kane moving to Smackdown. I've gone on an editing spree anyway to make the thread readable.

I didn't tell him to use spoilers to discuss the rumour, he used a colour tag to make the text white.

Personally i wouldnt read anything into this. I mean lets face it they probally released that transcript to get the smarks talking.

Personally i wouldnt read anything into this. I mean lets face it they probally released that transcript to get the smarks talking.

 

Havent you learned by now? Nothing WWE plans is for smarks

On another note it wouldn't exactly sound right or look good if Trips said "at backlash The Game doesn't begin!" Now would it?

I'm not saying he will or wont beat Cena but to say it's pretty obvious he will is a bit of an assumption just because he made/makes a confident, self assured heel promo isnt it?

Havent you learned by now? Nothing WWE plans is for smarks

 

 

So what think about it like this.... They release this all the Smarks and anit John Cena fan boys will start to go into a "We're glade Triple H is taking the title off Cena Cena sux" blah blah blah thinking that Triple H is going to win and then bang next think you know the moring after WM 22 the internet fans are still going to bitch cause they was out smarted by a possible fake transcript

So if Triple H wins at WrestleMania, why exactly would 'The Game' begin at Backlash? His title reign would begin on that night, not at Backlash a month later.

 

If anything, this suggests Triple H won't win, but Cena will lose the title in some way. How about one of the wrestlers in the Money In The back match win, and then after Cena beats Triple H, the wrestler cashes in the Money in The Bank, to win the WWE Title later that night.

So if Triple H wins at WrestleMania' date=' why exactly would 'The Game' begin at Backlash?[/quote']

Which is what I was trying to get at earlier:

On another note it wouldn't exactly sound right or look good if Trips said "at backlash The Game doesn't begin!" Now would it?

I'm not saying he will or wont beat Cena but to say it's pretty obvious he will is a bit of an assumption just because he made/makes a confident, self assured heel promo isnt it?

So what think about it like this.... They release this all the Smarks and anit John Cena fan boys will start to go into a "We're glade Triple H is taking the title off Cena Cena sux" blah blah blah thinking that Triple H is going to win and then bang next think you know the moring after WM 22 the internet fans are still going to bitch cause they was out smarted by a possible fake transcript

 

Did you simply ignore what I said??? WWE do not, I repeat, do not, cater for smarks. They never have and they never will and thats they way it should be. They would not be so pureile as it release a fake Backlash transcript

HHH is boring as champ, but he beats Cena, let Edge or HBK or hell anyone but Cena get it off him ASAP and Raw will be ok again

Those who don't get why it means HHH wins:

 

John Cena: "At Backlash, I'll take what's mine"

 

Seems pretty clear to me