Guest John Hancock Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 (edited) Rec 2 A curse on you! REC 1 is probably my favourite horror movie of the 21st century, and I thought REC 2 absolutely blew penises. A good horror movie sequel, PURE horror (so no Evil Dead 2), is an insanely rare thing. The Exorcist, The Blair Witch Project , American Psycho, Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Nightmare on Elm Street, The Hills Have Eyes, REC, The Amityville Horror, The Ring, Poltergeist, Saw, Hellraiser, Alien; some of the best horror movies ever, all with absolutely terrible sequels, some of which would rank up there with the worst films I've ever seen. Edited September 26, 2012 by John Hancock Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ciaran The King Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 Rec was a masterpiece and the second was a worthy sequel, I thought it worked quite well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxximus 353 Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 I'm sorry Johnny but Hellraiser 2 (uncut of course) was just as good as the first. Also, Phantasm 2 kicked ass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
etz 78 Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 (edited) And how was Aliens shit? Edited September 26, 2012 by John Hancock Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxximus 353 Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 Maybe because the premise changed from a horror to an action flick? I dunno, I loved all the Alien films despite their flaws. Not counting the AVP films, they were full of suck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest John Hancock Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 And how was Aliens shit? As I said; pure horror sequels only. I wouldn't call Aliens a horror film, it was an action film. I would consider the horror sequel to Alien to be Alien 3, which is when the series became a horror series again, and instantly began sucking. I'm sorry Johnny but Hellraiser 2 (uncut of course) was just as good as the first. In relation to the first one, which I like an awful lot, I didn't care for it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxximus 353 Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 The asylum scene alone freaked me out pretty bad when I first saw it. The rest was cheese interlaced with flashes of brutality. The whole autistic puzzle master little girl was a fantastic concept but they didn't quite pull it off. Halloween: Curse of Michal Myers was a great squeal and easily my favorite besides the original. Do you think Devil's Rejects was better than House of a Thousand Corpses? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest John Hancock Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 Yeah, the Halloween series had it's up and downs, I wouldn't write it off as a series. I prefer Thousand Corpses, but, to me, that question is like asking if I would prefer to have syphilis or AIDS. Sure, one's preferable to the other, but I'd be pretty bummed out about either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxximus 353 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 I see where you're coming from. I can be very picky when it comes to horrors too. Have you seen Cabin in the Woods and if so what did you think? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest John Hancock Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 Haven't seen it, but I want to, I hear it's really good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxximus 353 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 It wasn't what I expected at all. The concept itself was pretty damn genius. Lots of twists and turns. I strongly recommend it. As a horror fan it's really hard to find something different and this was very different. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Phil Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 Back on topic!! I always found the Crow sequels to be poor, until number 4 (I think, the one with the dude from Ugly Betty). That one actually worked really well, just a shame it had Kirsten Dunst in it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King 277 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 Casino Not a sequel to Goodfellas per say but had most of the original cast, and the same director, it felt like a sequel to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ViciousPrism 177 Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 (edited) Back on topic!! I always found the Crow sequels to be poor, until number 4 (I think, the one with the dude from Ugly Betty). That one actually worked really well, just a shame it had Kirsten Dunst in it. EDIT: Yeah that was a pretty good sequel. Shame the next one had Edward Furlong shitting things up. Didn't realize until I looked it up that there's been 5 Crow films (And another one on the way.) Edited September 27, 2012 by ViciousPrism Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Anime Otaku Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 Rebuild of Evangelion 2.xx is brilliant, can't wait for 3.xx to come out and see how much it diverges from the original series. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.