Jump to content


Open Club  ·  37 members  ·  Free

Wrestling

WWE Press Release: Owen Hart /Lewmar Inc


Kam

Recommended Posts

WWE Press Release:

 

STAMFORD, Conn., January 27, 2003 - World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc., today said it would vigorously pursue recovering the cost of its settlement in the Owen Hart case from Lewmar, Inc., the United Kingdom based manufacturer of the shackle clip whose premature release led to the accidental death of Owen Hart, now that a Missouri Judge has said a settlement between Lewmar and Martha Hart (Plaintiff) was invalid because it was not in good faith and was done for an improper purpose.

 

The Honorable Douglas Long, sitting by special appointment of the Missouri Supreme Court, ruled that the settlement between the Plaintiff and Lewmar for no money was conceived in a fraudulent manner. The judge said that there was overwhelming evidence in the record that “the Plaintiffs and/or Plaintiffs’ counsel and Lewmar engaged in fraud, collusion and/or tortious conduct in negotiating, executing and seeking approval” of Lewmar’s settlement with the Plaintiff.

 

The WWE announced an $18 million settlement in November 2000 with the Plaintiff and then challenged the validity of the Lewmar release. The judge noted that Lewmar had $50 million in insurance coverage for damages arising from Owen Hart’s death. The judge said the failure of the Plaintiff’s legal firm, Robb & Robb, to recommend the Plaintiff demand payment for all or a significant portion of these funds from Lewmar was questionable and that “…substantial evidence exists that Plaintiffs’ counsel was motivated by a desire to prevent facts concerning Lewmar’s liability for this accident from coming to light in an effort to construct a punitive damages claim against WWE,” the judge stated. If the release had been upheld by the Court, the settlement between Lewmar and the Plaintiff would have prevented WWE from seeking redress against Lewmar for its role in the accident. WWE’s attorney, Jerry McDevitt of Kirkpatrick & Lockhart, said the company can now move forward with a case against Lewmar, which is set for trial in September 2003.

 

“This order contained some of the strongest judicial statements I’ve seen in my 22 years of practice about a case which, from the onset, was tainted by irregularities,” said McDevitt. “First, attempts to manipulate the judicial selection process caused the Missouri Supreme Court to specially appoint Judge Long. Next, we discovered Plaintiff and her counsel had entered into a written agreement to share the proceeds of any recovery with fact witnesses in the case. The propriety of that Agreement was about to be passed upon by the appellate courts of Missouri literally days before Plaintiff and her counsel decided to settle the case. When testimony was taken from Lewmar representatives in England, no attempt was made by Plaintiff’s counsel to establish the factual basis for Lewmar’s responsibility, and when we attempted to do so, Plaintiff’s counsel actually objected to questions proving their liability. As soon as the deposition was over, Plaintiff and her counsel announced they had released Lewmar from the case for no money even though Lewmar had offered to pay money. Now, as a result of Judge Long’s ruling, Lewmar will have to face up to its role in this tragedy and all that it did to avoid a decision on the merits.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...