I've seen this debate going on in recent times at various places around the internet, covering the full spectrum of opinion from the DVDVRish corner of the world where Cena wins by a landslide, to the piece on the front page of the WO reflecting the more commonly-held view that Cena "by no means should ever be compared to Angle in terms of his in-ring ability."
So I want to find out where TWO stands. Who is better in the ring, Angle or Cena?
I'm interested in the debate too. Why do you prefer one or the other? How do their best or worst matches, feuds, attributes compare?
Is this a ridiculous question because Cena sucks and Angle is great? Have we as a board experienced the Angle "backlash" enough to make this a contest? How do we really view Cena now?
As in-ring workers only. Who is better?
I've seen this debate going on in recent times at various places around the internet, covering the full spectrum of opinion from the DVDVRish corner of the world where Cena wins by a landslide, to the piece on the front page of the WO reflecting the more commonly-held view that Cena "by no means should ever be compared to Angle in terms of his in-ring ability."
So I want to find out where TWO stands. Who is better in the ring, Angle or Cena?
I'm interested in the debate too. Why do you prefer one or the other? How do their best or worst matches, feuds, attributes compare?
Is this a ridiculous question because Cena sucks and Angle is great? Have we as a board experienced the Angle "backlash" enough to make this a contest? How do we really view Cena now?