Would you pay for WWF ppv's?

[Guest mwnn]

If it came down to it and Sky started to charge for PPV programming how many people out there would pay to watch them?

 

(created a new thread from "looks like were gonna miss the rumble")

[Guest Dean]

I've always thought that since I pay for Sky why the hell should I pay for events that should be shown anyway. Never have I bought a PPV and I never will, the way TV is going now it looks like I will miss a lot in the future, but who really cares. Why should we pay more so McMahon and Murdoch can throw another million on the pile.

[Guest Cactus Jack]

I havent got SKY, but I want it. But whats the point? The main attraction is really the football, but now you have to pay extra for that. It really is like this:

 

When you actually "buy" SKY, all you get is the dish and box, and if you want to actually watch what you have just paid for, you have to pay again!

[BRM 220]

no you pay for the channels, the dish and the box come free.

[Guest Dizzy]

Didn't I see this question posted some where else bebefore her? Cop Cat

[Guest Perfection]

If you read all of his post you wouldn't of have asked that question, use your brain.

[Guest Sasuke]

No, I would not pay for PPVs, simple as that. We already have to pay a subscription rate for Sky and I think that's quite enough to pay. Sure, I sympathise with the Americans who do have to pay for the Pay Per Views, but I do not sympathise enough to want to join them.

[BRM 220]

As stated above, you do all ready pay for the existing sky packages, but its the same over in the states. The fact over there is that 1 company does not have such a huge monopoly. Her we have sky which is efftevely fox in the states, i don't know the names but there are several in the us.

 

As for the ppv's i'd buy the rumble, wmania and kotr. As i think that these one's all have something special about them. But then again if the others have good matches that they sell well, you never know.

[Guest Cactus Jack]

If I had SKY, to be honest, I would still purchase a PPV if the ONLY match scheduled was Big Show vs Mick Foley in a bikini clad, swimming pool iron-man match. :roll

[BRM 220]

then you live a very sheltred life.

[Guest Dizzy]

Originally posted by Dizzy

Didn't I see this question posted some where else bebefore her? Cop Cat

 

Hey, thats why they call me 'Dizzy'.

[K.J 71]

I'd probably pay a tenner for one of the big 5, but not much more than that.

 

I definately wouldn't pay for any of the old "In Your House" PPV's.

[Guest Skullmonkey]

Boy you all should count yourself's lucky........ They cost $29.95 each in the US, and that is on top of the cable/satellite fee's.

[Guest NJC]

I would pay a tenner if a match really interested me, and I would definately pay for the Rumble and Wrestlemania.

 

Only two or three a year though.

[Guest Latino Reheat]

I'd only pay for the ones that had a good line up of matches, or if someone was returning/leaving. Even then I'd only want to spend a fiver for it at the most.