Posted October 2, 200321 yr Booker T has being booked (No pun intented) with Kane at a House show in a few weeks. Nice to see him back. So could a TV Kane fued be in his future. I hope so.
October 2, 200321 yr So do I, to keep him away from the IC title, and keep his sucky wrestling to a minimum as hopefully Kane will destroy him. Ed
October 2, 200321 yr Author Sucky wrestling Can't say I agree. So he has a limited moveset so Does Brock Lesner, Goldberg & co & it does not stop them being good wrestlers. No T is a good wrestler.
October 3, 200321 yr Good to hear that the Booker-man will be returning soon. I hope he gets a high profile feud, as he deserves to be in the main event bracket. I am still waiting for the day when the "5-time" WCW champ becomes "1-time" WWE world champ.
October 3, 200321 yr I'd rather see Rikishi as world champ than Booker T. They might both only be over because they dance, but at least Rikishi uses more than 2 wrestling moves per match. Ed
October 3, 200321 yr Rikishi is over because he has a fat rear end, and he puts it in peoples faces. Booker T is over because he has talent, charisma, and has a good ring presence.
October 3, 200321 yr Originally posted by AlanJP Rikishi is over because he has a fat rear end, and he puts it in peoples faces. Booker T is over because he has talent, charisma, and has a good ring presence. And Booker T is over because he does a breakdance move, and shouts "Sucka!!" in people's faces. Rikishi is over because he has talent, charisma, a good ring prescence AND sticks his arse in people's faces. :P Ed
October 3, 200321 yr Author Booker T is over because he has the talent to be over + he has the fan support. Rikishi is over because of ... well let's just say he is over.
October 3, 200321 yr Ed, you really have a ton to learn. You're both a riot, and annoying at the same time. Booker T is a great, solid worker who can have a good match with most other guys.
October 3, 200321 yr I'm sorry ED! But I'll have to disagree with you on Boooker T and Rikishi! Booker T is good worker in my opinion, but I can't stand Rikishi and WWF should stop messing around with this contract thing and just fire him already! Hey Singhy! Don't diss Ed! Whether he's wrong or he's right, he's still Ed (the most entertaining poster on TWO:xyx )! Just imagine what this board would be like without him because I know exactly what a wrestling board without Ed is like and it isn't pretty! Boards without their resident Ed aren't interesting! Cheers, Joe (Official Ed mark of TWO)
October 4, 200321 yr Originally posted by Rikidozan Ed, you really have a ton to learn. You're both a riot, and annoying at the same time. Booker T is a great, solid worker who can have a good match with most other guys. In YOUR opinion he is. In my opinion he sucks badly. And I've heard all the crap about his "best of 9" series with Benoit in WCW, but that was years ago. If Booker T is still great because of some matches he had a few years ago then HHH is still the best wrestler in WWE, becuase he was 2 years ago. Where is your evidence that Booker T is a solid worker? All he does is kicks! And most of them are clumsy-looking. Billy Gunn is a better wrestler than Booker because he uses more wrestling moves, and doesn't need a stupid dance move. Oh, I forgot, you're going off the "Commandments" of smarkdom. Booker T is good no matter how bad his matches are or his lack of anything resembling a wrestling move. Likewise A-Train, and anyone else over 250lbs are useless lumps. Arguing with any of these statements means you have a lot to learn! What a load of rubbish! Ed
October 4, 200321 yr Originally posted by Ed_666 In YOUR opinion he is. In my opinion he sucks badly. And I've heard all the crap about his "best of 9" series with Benoit in WCW, but that was years ago. If Booker T is still great because of some matches he had a few years ago then HHH is still the best wrestler in WWE, becuase he was 2 years ago. Ed So, you are finally admitting that HHH isn't the best today? :D I knew you'd come through some day! :xyx
October 4, 200321 yr Oh...my...God... you just said Billy Gunn is a better wrestler than Booker T. From this day forward, I will totally disregard everything you say Ed Ed, you're clueless, you really are. Ed, can you, for instance, name me the worlds oldest pro wrestling promotion?
October 4, 200321 yr Originally posted by Rikidozan Ed, you're clueless, you really are. Ed, can you, for instance, name me the worlds oldest pro wrestling promotion? :roll Not that line again Singhy, fair enough you may disagree with Ed's opinion on Booker T but what has that question got to do with whether Booker T is a good wrestler or not? I would hazard a guess and say maybe 95% of wrestling fans dont know the answer to that question, it doesnt make them clueless it just means they have a life outside of following wrestling ;)
October 4, 200321 yr Originally posted by HSM :roll Not that line again Singhy, fair enough you may disagree with Ed's opinion on Booker T but what has that question got to do with whether Booker T is a good wrestler or not? I would hazard a guess and say maybe 95% of wrestling fans dont know the answer to that question, it doesnt make them clueless it just means they have a life outside of following wrestling ;) and not only does no one care, anyone with a computer can look up the answer in 30 seconds, thus rendering the whole question pointless but anyways, i disagree ed...i admit booker is not a great wrestler, but he is certainly a good wrestler worthy of being world champion and come on...billy gunn and rikishi?? they are horrible...booker t is far more talented then them and is much more over then either of them have been in the past 3 years Edited October 4, 200321 yr by tazz13
October 4, 200321 yr Lol, boy oh boy, do you not see the hypocritical irony here?. You only gave that response because you can't answer the question. I could easily apply the "not that line again" theory to your answers:lol My question was to simply illustrate that Ed's knowledge is sorely lacking, therefore his views and points need to be taken as such:) Getting back on topic, i'll be glad to see Booker back, Raw is in sore need of a decent worker who can verbalise as well. Maybe a program (that's a storyline;) ) with Kane will put the two on the next level.
October 4, 200321 yr Originally posted by Rikidozan Lol, boy oh boy, do you not see the hypocritical irony here?. You only gave that response because you can't answer the question. I could easily apply the "not that line again" theory to your answers:lol "anyone can look up the answer in 30 seconds" if someone cared about your question they would look up the answer and type it here...no one cares and anyways the answer is CMLL but whatever, i agree with your points on booker t
October 4, 200321 yr Hey Singhy! I respect that you take your wresling and MMA seriously and that you are knowledgable about it, but it just makes you sound overbearing by coming out with the old I know more than you routine! It causes arguments! If you disagree with Ed or anyone for that matter, why don't you try just try and prove your point without trying to prove that you know what your talking about, while everyone else doesn't! It's okay if you say something like "Hey Ed, I disagree with you for the following reasons" but it just comes off as being rude if you start saying stuff like "I know more about wrestling than you do" just because you strongly disagree with Ed's opinions! Cheers, Joe
October 4, 200321 yr Author Now why did I start this thread again? Oh yes to mention that Booker T was returning... ...Get's back on topic when will the 5 time 5 time champ become the 1 time 1 time WWE champ?