Jump to content
Fan Clubs (beta)

The Icon

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13,877

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    27

 Content Type 

Everything posted by The Icon

  1. The Icon
    It was yes. The year before the rumble was for the title. Then from 93 on it was for a world title shot.
  2. The Icon
    Yokozuna, by dumping first Backlund then Randy Savage. The savage spot was funny as he tried to pin him. Intentional or blown spot?
  3. The Icon
    Royal rumble 1993. Some say it's a lesser rumble but I love it. Highlights are Backlunds long stay, and getting the crowd on his side since at first they didn't care And Flair vs Perfect spot.
  4. The Icon
    I think he will be booked as a strong face sooner or later.
  5. The Icon
    How about no? Well Taker OK I can give you. But not because of anything to do with size. Only because of how his character works is that he is unstoppable, and everybody he faces is an underdog. People half his size have often beaten Show. So nobody would take Langston serious as an underdog vs him.
  6. The Icon
    Nice speech. Pointless though as he does not look small next to any of those men. Nor should a man of his size ever be portrayed as an underdog.
  7. The Icon
    Dazed and confused. We could play this game all night. Like any actor he has had good roles and bad.
  8. The Icon
    Yeah but in no way is Langston a small man, no matter who you compare him too.
  9. The Icon
    I would like to see that, but not now. I would like to see it when Henry is heel and Big e turns good. I suspect Langston could be an enjoyable fan fav.
  10. The Icon
    I am with you with all the rest. But Big E a small man? Are you extracting the urine?
  11. The Icon
    Not in 20 years will hhh do this. He should mind.
  12. The Icon
    I can if done right.
  13. The Icon
    I see more Zayn v Bourne, Kingston and such. Also new big statement Kofi Kingston is turning heel for a push in the next 90 days.
  14. The Icon
    Yes he is. Which is why WWE seem to have stopped pushing him.
  15. The Icon
    The point is appeal to mexician/spanish fans.
  16. The Icon
    I dont see it myself. I think they wont fight on the main roster.
  17. The Icon
    I was just about to mention him above. Then I thought is he over enough for fans to care right now. Also his contract runs out soon. I have a feeling WWE may future endeavour him.
  18. The Icon
    It could be worse, Clooney and the bat nipples could have returned.
  19. The Icon
    This may get me flack here, but the abomination above aside, Affleck is a good enough actor that as I said I will watch the film before I make judgement.
  20. The Icon
    Ben Affleck? Well no worse than Val Kilmer or George Clooney neither of which suited the role. So I will give the lad a chance. After all back in 1987 people thought Keaton was a horrible choice but he nailed the role. Affleck could be good or bad, but I will say it is an odd choice.
  21. The Icon
    So never then.
  22. The Icon
    Ok so who in WWE is the, as you put it, perfect little man to stand up to him. No name springs instantly to mind.
  23. The Icon
    I prefer the leave idea. Give people a reason to tune into raw on monday after.
  24. The Icon
    Bryan vs Shamus is second shortest. Kane vs Chavo is shortest. Well if you trust info from WWE. Com.
  25. The Icon
    oh i fully expect this. I think they will do the we have all the champions bit.
×
×
  • Create New...