JobberJoe

No. JobberJoe: "Saz said, and I quote, "I am innocent" [in reference to himself. He did NOT say that JJ was innocent. He was indicating towards himself, as in Saz]. That means that Saz is claiming that HE is innocent. He makes no reference towards me - I'm simply stating that the sentence he said is indeed true. I don't even necessarily agree that Saz is innocent, I just have total faith that whatever Saz said was the truth. He said that he was innocent? Well that must be the case then."

No. Saz says "I am innocent". That means Saz is making a claim about himself - ie. that Saz is not the killer, that he himself did not commit the crime. JJ (I? oh-ho-ho) then come along and say that the statement which Saz says is true. Therefore, Saz referring to himself (and not me) about not being the killer is the case. He doesn't even look my way. You read that all very, very strangely. I'm furious that I messed up the Scooby Doo joke :( Thought it was really funny too. EDIT: Somebody else explain why Shaolin is wrong please.

DAMMIT - and I would've got away with it to if it hadn't been for those stupid forum posters (one of whom is... my victim... YOINKS!).

"Oh so that was you I saw walking down the street. Next time I'll say "Hi"."

Gud, what an idiot you are Spazz :P.

I concur, f*cking idiots.

NmCCQxVBfyM :D :D :D :D :D :D I can play this b*tch - and I'm not talkin' about the game... cause I'm pretty awful at Tetris... Love that tune though.

Plus it would just give Tonga another excuse to bring up his massive d*ck. It gets so tiresome :(.

I don't think you realise... He's the best there is, the best there was and the best there ever will be. THE BEST.

Yeah - they're both Irish. Look, it works for any nationality: English: Barrett and Dynamite Kid. Japanese: Liger and Misawa. Mexico: Mysterio and... well, whatever... it'll be the same. All the freakin' same.

But it's not to a degree, because you're little after-school special answer has NO RELEVANCE to the argument we're having. It's like you've just thrown it in there as a desperate attempt to stop all the fighting and make everybody think of you as some kind of sage who ended the Kinect War. But you didn't - you just sounded stupid. Holy Diver!!

But... the thing is, she originally sounded like she was calling who anybody who played a game and enjoyed it a loser. That's where your point would come in as a "well we're all geeks in our own special ways, aww happy ending." BUT THEN the argument went further, to a point where she was actually discussing somebody who's day-to-day living is effected by the amount they play games - which most people would agree are losers, cause in THAT situation you can drop anything you want in there and if it's stopping you living a normal (OOH BUT WHAT'S NORMAL) day-to-day life then it's an issue. Go on, let's drop a few things in there - games, alcohol, sex, drugs, OCD, depressions, the colour blue... See, so at this point, where our argument has been taken to - your point has no relevance at all (although I'm sure we could happily argue that to some degree or another we're all 'soft-addicts' of something or another. But that sounds like a really stupid debate... sorta' like this one). COME ON!

Specifically here though, he wasn't "having a go". You said something stupid and he called you on it. People who get immersed in games aren't necessarily losers - as has been pointed out on a few occasions. Even you then went on to admit that you just worded your point badly - that you meant people who spent far too long on games, to a point where they were sacrificing their normal day to day living. Stop being so dramatic.

Hot damn yeah - when sh*t was "Backlund Approved", gimmick overhauls were going to every man and their dog, Nash had graphs for EVERYTHING and Sonjay Dutt was on steroids. Great, great times!!

Oh yeah - although I'm not an avid watcher there's at least a fight an episode (at least, every one I've seen). Sometimes two depending on how far in you're going. It's the kind of thing Shao, because you like MMA, you're willing to let slip some of things you'd normally really hate about reality television... if that makes sense...

*raises hand*

In 8 years, I see wrestling in space. Big money there, you mark my words.

:lol Shuttup.

Give me anyway in which Spidey could beat Superman - anything at all in which ol' Parker-pants has the edge or advantage. There's no way. No way.

superdickery.com - no need to thank me.

Belty wants you to read this. If you're not part of the solution then you're part of the problem - poser!

Remember THAT match Festus had with Undertaker on Smackdown? I mean, before that point Festus had been a bit of fun - gimmicky fun with a limited shelf life, but fun all the same. And then THAT match with Undertaker and I was just utterly blown away. What a great match that was. That's all.

Yeah, wow, Silva got slaughtered all the way through. Was a real shame to see, but at the same time made for a darn entertaining fight as I was waiting for Anderson to pull out the huge knockout attack - and then it never really came. Enjoyed it, although missed the first two rounds of the first fight.

YASS!! My faith and prayers paid off.

And BOOM! goes the Dynamite(Kid).