Guest Jung Posted January 2, 2004 Share Posted January 2, 2004 Are you just ignorant or deaf? And as for your last thing, if we don't know the difference between good wrestling and bad wrestling, then I guess you and the other 2.7 who watched WCW know that, but the other millions who watched Nitro when it was 5.7 don't? Please, for one post try and not contradict yourself, I don't think I've ever come across a lousier argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TNARICK Posted January 2, 2004 Share Posted January 2, 2004 When Nitro got good ratings it was because they started to try new cutting edge stuff. That just isnt happening anymore in TNA or WWE. Thats my point. Then Russo even topped Nitro in WWF with his cutting edge tv. Do you understand now that people only watch when its something new, original, and as I said, cutting edge. PLEASE SOMEONE COME UP WITH A DIFFERENT ARGUMENT, I have been hearing the same ones over and over and you never get any better at it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Blue Boy Posted January 2, 2004 Share Posted January 2, 2004 So tell me again, Rick, how do you reply to the allegations that he's just known for recycling angles? I just want to see your honest views on this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Walshy Posted January 2, 2004 Share Posted January 2, 2004 Originally posted by TNARICK When Nitro got good ratings it was because they started to try new cutting edge stuff. Yeah but that was between 1996-98 when Bischoff was in charge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TNARICK Posted January 2, 2004 Share Posted January 2, 2004 hey You guys always say Russo recycles angels but you jsut make stuff up, because they are nothing alike. One that comes to mind is you compare S.E.X. to The New Blood. Just because Russo is in it dosnt make it the New Blood. It was there for a totally different reason. TNA wasnt booking the people in S.E.X. and wouldnt pay for them to come to the shows, so Russo brought them up for his own group in storyline. New Blood was just Eric and Russo wanting the younger talent to take over WCW because the old guys were making the shows boring. To bad in life, the Old guys wouldnt work with it , or else it would have been a big sucess. NEW BLOOD still is my fav stable though. Washy i know it was under Eric, Im not here to praise just Russo but his vision. Other people can do it also and I wish more would. Its people that try new stuff thats realistic and cutting edge that works. Eric did it and he got a couple years in the spotlight. To bad though he had a lack for good comedy or he might have the shows even better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Blue Boy Posted January 2, 2004 Share Posted January 2, 2004 Re: hey Originally posted by TNARICK Washy i know it was under Eric, Im not here to praise just Russo but his vision. Other people can do it also and I wish more would. Its people that try new stuff thats realistic and cutting edge that works. Eric did it and he got a couple years in the spotlight. To bad though he had a lack for good comedy or he might have the shows even better. Yeah, shame Russo doesn't know good humour either. Tequila on a Pole? Yeah... hilarious Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kam 243 Posted January 2, 2004 Share Posted January 2, 2004 Re: Re: hey Originally posted by The Blue Boy Yeah, shame Russo doesn't know good humour either. Tequila on a Pole? Yeah... hilarious What about the classic Viagra on a poll match! :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts