Dead Crow 370 Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Someone is in big trouble over that Piledriver spot. Meltzer saying that Vince blew his gasket when it happened, and Cena won't get punished for sh*t. Quite possibly, neither will Punk. So I'm looking at whoever the road agent was. Shame, as it was a shocking moment in a great match, but rules be rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ViciousPrism 177 Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 When in doubt fire the road agent. Worked for Finlay and Goldust. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ciaran The King Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 NOTHING is better that MitB 2011! :lol Nothing? And also what is bad about two seasoned perfomers using a piledriver? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxximus 353 Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 "Cute piledriver, Punk" - Kevin Steen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ViciousPrism 177 Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Nothing? And also what is bad about two seasoned perfomers using a piledriver? Cena's neck injury. The fact that even two seasoned performers could easily f*ck it up. (See Austin/Chono and ironically, Hart/Austin. Same botched piledriver. Karma exists.) and the fact that aside from Undertaker's Tombstone, all other piledriver variations are banned. For a while the Shooting Star Press was banned too. F*cking Kidman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxximus 353 Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Different kind of piledriver. Way more risk with the reverse driver then the standard. Don't get me wrong, it's still risky, just not as much as some other variations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ViciousPrism 177 Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Different kind of piledriver. Way more risk with the reverse driver then the standard. Don't get me wrong, it's still risky, just not as much as some other variations. Yeah, that's true, but still there's still the stigma that it could still go wrong very easily. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxximus 353 Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Oh yeah, no doubt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dsrchris 190 Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Nothing? NO-THING. Seriously, favourite PPV (and PPV match) in easily the last...wow, probably 20 something years for me. And also what is bad about two seasoned perfomers using a piledriver? It's just on the no-no list. Which I imagine they were more than aware of heading into the match. Truth be told my heart was in my mouth a little. We all know how sloppy the Punker can get from time to time... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Edgehead Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 I was stunned when I saw that piledriver. Although not quite as stunned as when Cena hit that Rana :lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ciaran The King Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Wrestling is a risk but you can break you're bones doing the most simple tasks in life Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dsrchris 190 Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Well yeah, but obviously the risk is exponentially greater for anything that involves you plummeting head first towards the floor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest John Hancock Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 It's also the move that broke Steve Austin's neck. I think Chyna got super badly injured with one as well. They're banned over other moves because, whilst, if you mess up another move, you might hurt yourself, if you mess up a piledriver, there's a legitimately good chance you'll be paralysed or die. It's the same reason they banned the Shooting Star Press for a while, because that's another move where, if you mess it up, you break your neck. One of the general post-Benoit rules has been a real crackdown on moves that can easily cause serious neck damage. It's not big deal from the WWE, they've pretty much always been illegal in lucha-libre as far as I know, and it was (and possibly still is) illegal in Memphis. I think the WWE's rule is that you have to be super strong to do it, because then you can hold the guy properly, which is why The Undertaker gets away with it, but Punk, as a guy with a serious reputation for not being particularly strong and f*cking up moves as it is, really shouldn't be trying it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ViciousPrism 177 Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 I'm not 100%, but I believe Chyna's one was just part of the RTC angle where they gave her a spike piledriver. But again, not 100%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest John Hancock Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Yeah, that sounds about right to me too. I'm going to cheat and look it up. Bah, can't find it, so here's Austin almost dying; [video=youtube;OKYYsg-jMfU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKYYsg-jMfU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ciaran The King Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Although I agree with the points made by everyone about the dangers of certain moves but if done correctly then everyone should be okay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest John Hancock Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 And what if they don't do it correctly? That's like legalising driving at 100mph because, if you do it correctly, you won't hit anyone. A piledriver is a really easy move to mess up and if you mess it up even slightly, it's incredibly dangerous. The WWE enforces a very sensible policy where only trusted guys like the Undertaker get permission to do it on a case by case basis, in the same way that Evan Bourne got permission to do the Shooting Star Press because he proved he could do it safely. It's not worth the risk of having sloppy guys like Punk, without permission (if that story's true), using moves with a track record for causing life-threatening injuries when it adds nothing to the match other than easy shock value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Canned Heat Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Cena's STF should also be illegal. It just looks THAT stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Fatherof10minis Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Michael Cole should be banned for not knowing an STF from a crossface. Stupidity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dead Crow 370 Posted February 26, 2013 Author Share Posted February 26, 2013 WWE went hard on any move with a real danger of screwing someone's head or neck. The piledriver was the main move but I'm positive that there were others as well (the Brainbuster, I think, was one). I admire them taking a safety-first stance in light of injuries that have occurred, but Punk did a decent job of the move to be honest and it did actually add to the match. My only critique is that it was ultimately a nothing move. In 2013 WWE, a piledriver could be a storyline in waiting - a move ala the Orton punt which people are preconditioned to accept as an injury set up. Used correctly in angles, the piledriver could be huge again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts