Maxximus 353 Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Nothing should be banned more than Ryback and his everything except for Miz's Fail Four Leg Cross hold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omega 354 Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Ryback > The Rock's Sharpshooter.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ciaran The King Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 I hate the Rock's sharpshooter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest the HiTman Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 I love(d) a proper Piledriver - 'Takers one allows weight to held on his shoulders so there's very little risk of it going wrong considering 'Takers height and strength. An angle based on a move is quite odd, but yeah, it worked with Orton. Albeit it was hardly a 'move'. If the 'story' was for a wrestler to Piledrive with the intention of causing a neck injury, and it goes wrong - it'll just backfire. I guess it's a good thing for all that it's a banned move. Are chair shots to the head banned yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omega 354 Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 in wwe yes. all chair shots are protected shots or back shots Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ciaran The King Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 (edited) Are chair shots to the head banned yet? I believe so. I still do believe if everyone is doing their jobs properly then there should be no mistakes Edited February 26, 2013 by Ciaran The King Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Fatherof10minis Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Wasn't there a big stink made when Triple h whacked taker with a headshot during WM27? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omega 354 Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 I believe that was because it was unprotected (ie takers didn;t lift his arm ti hit the chair). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxximus 353 Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 That's because everyone's a sissy. There's nothing wrong with protected headshots every once in awhile when a match or storyline calls for one. You can take relatively safe chair shots to the head. Still you never know, accidents happen. Better off for wwe to stay away from 'em. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dsrchris 190 Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Yup, I think they both got fined...which was next to nothing probably compared to their paydays for that match. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omega 354 Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 I believe so. I still do believe if everyone is doing their jobs properly then there should be mistakes i presume you mean no mistakes and if you genuinely believe that you are an idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dsrchris 190 Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 I believe the technical phrase is "sh*t happens". Regardless of how safe you and the guy you're working with are trying to be there will always be an unknown risk/danger element to anything they do in the ring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ciaran The King Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 I believe the technical phrase is "sh*t happens". Regardless of how safe you and the guy you're working with are trying to be there will always be an unknown risk/danger element to anything they do in the ring. Therefore what don't you ban? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dsrchris 190 Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Obviously you rank moves accordingly to their risk factor. The ones most likely to do permanent damage are those involving damage to the head or neck area, so out go your chairshots, piledrivers, and anything where there is a real present danger of someone's entire weight coming down directly on their head and neck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest John Hancock Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Therefore what don't you ban? You ban the moves that revolve around people landing directly on the top of their heads. It's a very simple solution to a very obvious problem, I really don't see the issue here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dead Crow 370 Posted February 27, 2013 Author Share Posted February 27, 2013 An angle based on a move is quite odd, but yeah, it worked with Orton. Albeit it was hardly a 'move'. If the 'story' was for a wrestler to Piledrive with the intention of causing a neck injury, and it goes wrong - it'll just backfire. Angles based on 'moves' have been done before. As mentioned in this thread, the Chyna/Ivory feud was built on a piledriver sold as being career-ending (for a couple of weeks), and Lawler/Kaufman was essentially one piledriver and a fake broken neck of publicity for Memphis. Something like the Piledriver looks brutal and WWE usually do a great job of overselling an understated injury angle. Get someone who you trust to be safe with a normal Piledriver (and the normal Piledriver is one of the safest moves to do, in fairness), and do it once every couple of years in a big injury angle, and people WILL buy it. Don't just throw it into a match and hope for the best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ciaran The King Posted February 27, 2013 Share Posted February 27, 2013 Saw the Punk piledriver and he executed it properly as it should be done Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 27, 2013 Share Posted February 27, 2013 When was the last Piledriver in the WWE? Other than the Tombstone Piledrivers? I'm struggling to remember. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ciaran The King Posted February 27, 2013 Share Posted February 27, 2013 I think HBK used one on Taker at WM25 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Beltster Posted February 27, 2013 Share Posted February 27, 2013 I watched the match, and it was a good match, and it didnt even dawn on me that there was a piledriver ban. I had forgotten all about it, being that its such a f*cking retarded rule/ban. I cant believe there's such a big fuss over it. Oh no, a wrestling move used in a wrestling match between two seasons pro's! Big deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts